A literature review should try to answer questions such as:
1. Who are the key researchers on this topic?
2. What has been the focus of the research efforts so far and what is the current status?
3. How have certain studies built on prior studies? Where are the connections? Are there new interpretations of the research?
4. Have there been any controversies or debate about the research? Is there consensus? Are there any contradictions?
5. Which areas have been identified as needing further research? Have any pathways been suggested?
6. How will your topic uniquely contribute to this body of knowledge?
7. Which methodologies have researchers used and which appear to be the most productive?
8. What sources of information or data were identified that might be useful to you?
9. How does your particular topic fit into the larger context of what has already been done?
10. How has the research that has already been done help frame your current investigation?
The Scholarly Conversation:
A literature review provides an overview of previous research on a topic that critically evaluates, classifies, and compares what has already been published on a particular topic. It allows the author to synthesize and place into context the research and scholarly literature relevant to the topic. It forms the foundation for the author’s subsequent research and justifies the significance of the new investigation.
A literature review can be a short introductory section of a research article, report or policy paper that focuses on recent research, or, in the case of dissertations, theses, and review articles, it can be an extensive review of all relevant research.
Example of lit review at the beginning of an article:
Williams, S., & Williams, L. (2005, May). Space invaders: The negotiation of teenage boundaries through the mobile phone. Sociological Review, 53(2), 314-331. Retrieved June 20, 2007, from SocIndex Full Text database (17131600): http://web.ebscohost.com
Example of a comprehensive review of the literature:
Jackson, J. E., & Warren, K. B. (2005). Indigenous movements in Latin America, 1992-2004: Controversies, ironies, new directions. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 549-573. Retrieved June 20, 2007, from Annual Reviews database: http://www.annualreviews.org/
For additional examples, see:
Galvan, J. L. (2009). Writing literature reviews: A guide for students of the social and behaviorial sciences. (4th. ed.). Glendale, CA: Pyrczak Publishing. [Reserve Desk H62.G359 2009]
Pan, M.L.. (2004). Preparing literature reviews: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.Glendale, CA: Pyrczak Publishing. [Q180.55.E9 P36 2004]
How to Write a Literature Review (UCSC)
Review of Literature (UW-Madison)
Literature Reviews: overview (UNC)
Literature Review - a THOROUGH guide from Atlanta University Center (Thanks, Brad Ost!)
The Evidence Matrix can help you organize your research before writing your lit review. Use it to identify patterns and commonalities in the articles you have found--similar methodologies? common theoretical frameworks? It helps you make sure that all your major concepts covered. It also helps you see how your research fits into the context of the overall topic.
A Literature Review is a scholarly analysis of a body of research about a specific issue or topic. (See Lit Review tab for more info.)
A Meta-Analysis is a statistical technique for combining the findings from independent studies to assess the clinical effectiveness of healthcare interventions.
A Random Control Trial (RCT) is an experiment that delivers an intervention or treatment; subjects are randomly assigned to control and experimental groups, so it is the strongest design to support cause and effect relationships.
A Systematic Review is a comprehensive, unbiased review of multiple research studies that tries to identify, appraise, select and synthesize all high quality research evidence relevant to that research question.